Trauma Is Well Recognized As A Situation †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Trauma Is Well Recognized As A Situation? Answer: Introduction Trauma is well recognized as a situation where an individual has an experience that is deeply distressing or one that is very disturbing. A physical injury, mostly on some ones head is also referred to as trauma, mostly because in a similar way, it affects the individual mentally. In order to ensure that they manage to address the issues faced by trauma patients effectively, physicians developed the trauma informed care (TIC). Trauma informed care refers to a treatment framework that an organization decides to establish and utilize, which is aimed at enabling the physicians to have the ability to address all forms of trauma and effects that may arise. This framework has made a significant and highly beneficial impact in treating individuals that are facing mental issues. This paper provides a clear description of what trauma informed care is its benefits to both physicians and patients that have mental challenges and the means through which it helps people improve their mental condit ions after having any form of traumatic or disturbing experience (Peitzman, 2013). Disease Background The trauma informed care helps physicians to improve the strategies that they use to treat individuals who have different forms of mental issues and problems that affect their understanding. It helps them recognize the existence of diverse emotions, disorders, and many other trauma related issues, within patients and thus they obtain the ability to address these issues effectively. A number of characteristics are associated with all forms of programs that are considered trauma informed. The first characteristic is the explanation that any form of trauma informed system of the program helps physicians in realizing the major impact of trauma on an individual, and also understands the potential paths that can be utilized for recovery to take place. The second characteristic of such a program is its ability to helps physicians recognize the signs and symptoms that trauma cause on patients, their families, staff members and all other individuals involved in the system (Wall, Higgins, Hun ter, 2016). How trauma guides mental Healthcare provision Without a clear understanding of the signs and symptoms that occur, it is very difficult for any physician to formulate treatment strategies. In order to ensure that the strategies used are significantly successful, at the same time, the physicians require to understand how the trauma of a certain patient impacts that patient, his or her friends and family and how it also impacts the staff members., with this clarity of situational understanding, the physician has the ability to establish a program and means through which he or she can address the issues that arise to the patient. This characteristic is therefore of significant importance and helps in a significant way to ensure that the system is effective in the activities of addressing issues of patients with a traumatic experience. The other characteristic of this system is its ability to help physicians respond to the trauma related cases that they seek to address by integrating the knowledge that they have about trauma into cer tain policies, practices, and procedures (Seng, Taylor, 2015). The other characteristics of this framework are the need to ensure that the patients manage to resist issues of re-traumatization, where the problem of trauma occurs again in their lives. The ability to make this resistance helps the individuals to eliminate aspects of the trauma and its impact on their lives. This aspect is significantly important in that it makes the individuals manage to improve their lives and become significantly appropriate in this improvement (Isobel, Edwards, 2017). Principles guiding trauma informed care Apart from these major and highly important characteristics of trauma informed care, the other aspect that is equally important to understand about this approach of addressing mental health is the six key principles. These principles help in guiding all the individuals who utilize it, in order to ensure that they fully adhere to the systems original design and manage to achieve its purpose with their patients. The first principle is safety. Safety is the main reason why this design of addressing trauma is developed. Involvement in any practice that might jeopardise the safety of any stakeholder of the system like the patient, the staff of the family and friends of the patients is completely avoided (Oudshoorn, 2015). The other major principle of this approach is transparency and trustworthiness. Like for the case of all other physician and patient relationships, trust and transparency is the basis through which they become healthy. Without trusting the physician, a patient cannot agree to be treated. Transparency, on the other hand helps to keep the patient updated and in understanding of all the occurrences and progress taking place in his or her body (Brown, McQueen, Tornetta, 2006). Without this understanding, it becomes extremely difficult for an individual or a patient to understanding how the order of things occur. Transparency and trustworthiness, therefore helps to guide individuals and patients towards the establishment of a good relationship which is essential for the recovery process of the patient (Poole, Greaves, 2012). The third main principle is peer support. Individuals with any form of mental issue which in many cases results into depression and other psychological issues improves significantly and at a faster rate when there is support from family members and friends. With this regard, therefore, the approach of trauma informed care encourage and advocate for peer support from family and friends to any individuals with any form of mental challenge, in order to help speed up the recovery process. The other principle is collaboration and mutuality. The process of offering care in this manner accepts the understanding that the need for mutual benefit between the patients and the care giver is important. With the mutual benefit aspect in place, both can work hard, to achieve the common result of the patients managing to fully recover and live according to the desired living standards and comfort. This aspect is thus considered important and appropriate for all individuals to consider (Kropp, 2015). The other key principle refers to empowerment, voice of the patient and choice. Empowerment is simply the aspect of enabling the patients to have the ability to live a normal life as much possible, despite the mental challenges that they may have. These challenges undermine their ability to ensure that their lives remain normal, an aspect that is considered negative. Voice is the aspect of listening to the interest and need that the patients have in relation to the care that is given to them and the aspect of responding to their concerns (Brailsford, 2007). Choice, on the other hand, involves the aspect of those individuals having the need to ensure that they completely remain effective in the activities that they involved in, and the need to ensure that they are the individuals who remain completely impactful and decisive on the care that is given to them. The other key principle involves the issues about the culture, history, and gender of the patients whose condition is being addr essed. The fact that the individuals have issues regarding their mental condition relates their issues with aspects of gender and culture. With this regard, therefore, it is appropriate to ensure that the staff members addressing their issues put into consideration these conditions and the means through which the conditions can be established (Oudshoorn, Zehr, 2016). Main findings Summary From the provisions of these principles and characteristics of the approach, it is easy for an individual to understand the means through which the framework help physicians to be effective in the activities of addressing mental health patients. The principles guide the actions of the physicians to an extent that they fully understand its importance and the means through which it is beneficial to all the important activities put in place. With this regard, therefore, it is appropriate to ensure that the individuals who utilize this framework completely adhere to the principles that guide its use (Clark, Classen, Fourt, Shetty, 2015). If for example, a physician decides to utilize this approach but dies not uphold the principle of trustworthiness and transparency, that caregiver operates at a risk of not managing to address the issues that his or her patient faces fully. As explained earlier, the relationship between a physician and the patient is of significant importance to both of them. In case the patient does not trust the doctor, it is very difficult for that doctor to treat the patient and for the patient to recover, mostly because that patient is less likely to adhere to the requirements and explanations of the care giver. If at the same time, the doctor is not transparent to the patient, their relationship cannot be considered healthy, an aspect that cannot establish effectiveness of operation (Wilson, Hutchinson, Hurley, 2017). Conclusion In conclusion, the trauma informed care help in ensuring that all individuals suffering from all forms of mental health issues have a chance of easy recovery and living like other normal individuals. The utilization of the trauma informed care approach help physicians to be more effective in their treatment strategies, compared to when this approach is not utilized. This is because utilizing the approach binds the caregiver to a certain set of principles that must be adhered to, in the process of giving care. Without these principles being put in place, it becomes difficult for the care givers to operate with high effectiveness. This aspect reduces the capability of those who do not utilize the approach but upholds that of the physicians who utilize the trauma informed care in their practice (Evans, 2016). References Brailsford, P. 2007.A practical approach to trauma : empowering interventions. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. Brown, C., McQueen, M. Tornetta, P. 2006.Trauma. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams Willkins. Clark, C., Classen, C., Fourt, A. Shetty, M. 2015.Treating the trauma survivor : an essential guide to trauma-informed care. New York, NY: Routledge. Evans, A. 2016.Trauma-informed care : how neuroscience influences practice. London New York: Routledge. Isobel, S. Edwards, C. 2017. Using trauma informed care as a nursing model of care in an acute inpatient mental health unit: A practice development process: International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. Kropp, D. 2015.Trauma-Informed Care : development of a web-based multimedia e-learning course. Davis, Calif: University of California, Davis. Oudshoorn, J. Zehr, H. 2016.Trauma-informed juvenile justice in the United States. Toronto: CSPI. Oudshoorn, J. 2015.Trauma-informed youth justice in Canada : a new framework toward a kinder future. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars' Press. Peitzman, A. 2013.The trauma manual trauma and acute care surgery. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams Wilkins. Poole, N. Greaves, L. 2012.Becoming trauma informed. Toronto: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. Seng, J. Taylor, J. 2015.Trauma Informed Care in the Perinatal Period Growing Forward. City: Dunedin Academic Pr Ltd. Wall, L., Higgins, D. Hunter, C. 2016.Trauma-informed care in child/family welfare services. Melbourne, Vic: Australian Institute of Family Studies. Wilson, A. Hutchinson, M. Hurley, J. 2017. Literature review of trauma-informed care: Implications for mental health nurses working in acute inpatient settings in Australia: International Journal of Mental Health Nursing.